Burning Ultrablue
#150aec
A blue that is about as vivid as sRGB can show at this lightness. It is mid — the hardest range to put text on, either colour struggles.
Hex
#150aec
RGB
21, 10, 236
OKLCh
43.4% 0.290 266.0°
CIELAB (D50)
28.0, 62.9, -103.9
What is true of this colour, and of no other
- 11 other named colours sit within ΔE00 2 of it — this part of the space is crowded, and the names here are finer distinctions than most people make.
- It uses 98% of the chroma sRGB can show at this lightness and hue — close enough to the boundary that a wider display would show it slightly more vividly.
- As text on white it measures APCA Lc 88.2; on black, Lc -14.0. The sign is the polarity, which the WCAG ratio discards.
- Built into an eleven-step scale, 10 of the 10 adjacent pairs stay ΔE00 2 apart — see the ramp.
- All three dichromacies see it as very nearly the same colour you do: its hue is not the part carrying its identity.
Text on this colour
White text
9.18:1 — passes AA
Black text
2.29:1 — fails AA
White text is the better of the two at9.18:1. That is enough for body text.
The same colour, with one cone missing
As you see it
#150aec
protanopia
#0c0cec · ΔE00 0.3
deuteranopia
#0e0eec · ΔE00 0.4
tritanopia
#1010ea · ΔE00 0.5
The twelve nearest named colours
Ranked by CIEDE2000 — perceptual distance, not hex arithmetic. The closest isHyperlink Blue at ΔE00 0.739: below 1.0 — an ordinary observer cannot tell these apart, even side by side. What the numbers mean.
- Hyperlink BlueΔE00 0.739 · #0000ee
- Midsummer NightsΔE00 0.806 · #0011ee
- Star of DavidΔE00 1.015 · #0000f7
- Strong BlueΔE00 1.105 · #0c06f7
- Primary BlueΔE00 1.272 · #0804f9
- Graphical 80’s SkyΔE00 1.508 · #0000fc
- Royal Blue TangΔE00 1.665 · #1600fc
- Pure BlueΔE00 1.686 · #0203e2
- BlueΔE00 1.831 · #0000ff
- Nightfall in SuburbiaΔE00 1.871 · #0011dd
- Delft BlueΔE00 1.896 · #3311ee
- BluebonnetΔE00 2.088 · #1c1cf0
7 of these have no page of their own: pages exist for the 4,961 colours the dataset marks as good names.