Hyperlink Blue
#0000ee
A blue that is about as vivid as sRGB can show at this lightness. It is mid — the hardest range to put text on, either colour struggles.
Hex
#0000ee
RGB
0, 0, 238
OKLCh
42.9% 0.297 264.1°
CIELAB (D50)
27.3, 64.8, -106.3
What is true of this colour, and of no other
- 10 other named colours sit within ΔE00 2 of it — this part of the space is crowded, and the names here are finer distinctions than most people make.
- It sits exactly on the sRGB boundary: at this lightness and hue the gamut has nothing left, and a wider display would show a more colourful version of it.
- As text on white it measures APCA Lc 88.1; on black, Lc -14.0. The sign is the polarity, which the WCAG ratio discards.
- Built into an eleven-step scale, 10 of the 10 adjacent pairs stay ΔE00 2 apart — see the ramp.
- All three dichromacies see it as very nearly the same colour you do: its hue is not the part carrying its identity.
Text on this colour
White text
9.40:1 — passes AA
Black text
2.23:1 — fails AA
White text is the better of the two at9.40:1. That is enough for body text.
The same colour, with one cone missing
As you see it
#0000ee
protanopia
#0000ee · ΔE00 0.0
deuteranopia
#0000ee · ΔE00 0.0
tritanopia
#0000ee · ΔE00 0.0
The twelve nearest named colours
Ranked by CIEDE2000 — perceptual distance, not hex arithmetic. The closest isBurning Ultrablue at ΔE00 0.739: below 1.0 — an ordinary observer cannot tell these apart, even side by side. What the numbers mean.
- Burning UltrablueΔE00 0.739 · #150aec
- Star of DavidΔE00 1.07 · #0000f7
- Midsummer NightsΔE00 1.242 · #0011ee
- Pure BlueΔE00 1.321 · #0203e2
- Strong BlueΔE00 1.412 · #0c06f7
- Primary BlueΔE00 1.522 · #0804f9
- Graphical 80’s SkyΔE00 1.663 · #0000fc
- Nightfall in SuburbiaΔE00 1.831 · #0011dd
- Royal Blue TangΔE00 1.926 · #1600fc
- UltramarineΔE00 1.957 · #1805db
- BlueΔE00 2.019 · #0000ff
- BluealiciousΔE00 2.029 · #0000dd
8 of these have no page of their own: pages exist for the 4,961 colours the dataset marks as good names.