Rare Blue

#0044ff

A blue that is about as vivid as sRGB can show at this lightness. It is mid — the hardest range to put text on, either colour struggles.

Hex

#0044ff

RGB

0, 68, 255

OKLCh

50.7% 0.277 263.7°

CIELAB (D50)

38.2, 44.1, -97.6

What is true of this colour, and of no other

  • 3 other named colours sit within ΔE00 2 of it.
  • It sits exactly on the sRGB boundary: at this lightness and hue the gamut has nothing left, and a wider display would show a more colourful version of it.
  • As text on white it measures APCA Lc 80.2; on black, Lc -21.6. The sign is the polarity, which the WCAG ratio discards.
  • Built into an eleven-step scale, 10 of the 10 adjacent pairs stay ΔE00 2 apart — see the ramp.
  • tritanopia shifts it by ΔE00 5.3 — no blue cone.

Text on this colour

White text

6.42:1 — passes AA

Black text

3.27:1 — large text only

White text is the better of the two at6.42:1. That is enough for body text.

The same colour, with one cone missing

As you see it

#0044ff

protanopia

#4040ff · ΔE00 3.7

deuteranopia

#3939ff · ΔE00 4.1

tritanopia

#3030ff · ΔE00 5.3

Run a whole palette through all three

The twelve nearest named colours

Ranked by CIEDE2000 — perceptual distance, not hex arithmetic. The closest isMagic Ink at ΔE00 0.788: below 1.0 — an ordinary observer cannot tell these apart, even side by side. What the numbers mean.

9 of these have no page of their own: pages exist for the 4,961 colours the dataset marks as good names.