C64 Blue

#003aff

A blue that is about as vivid as sRGB can show at this lightness. It is mid — the hardest range to put text on, either colour struggles.

Hex

#003aff

RGB

0, 58, 255

OKLCh

49.3% 0.285 264.0°

CIELAB (D50)

36.2, 49.5, -101.0

What is true of this colour, and of no other

  • 3 other named colours sit within ΔE00 2 of it.
  • It sits exactly on the sRGB boundary: at this lightness and hue the gamut has nothing left, and a wider display would show a more colourful version of it.
  • As text on white it measures APCA Lc 81.9; on black, Lc -20.0. The sign is the polarity, which the WCAG ratio discards.
  • Built into an eleven-step scale, 10 of the 10 adjacent pairs stay ΔE00 2 apart — see the ramp.
  • All three dichromacies see it as very nearly the same colour you do: its hue is not the part carrying its identity.

Text on this colour

White text

6.89:1 — passes AA

Black text

3.05:1 — large text only

White text is the better of the two at6.89:1. That is enough for body text.

The same colour, with one cone missing

As you see it

#003aff

protanopia

#3737ff · ΔE00 2.7

deuteranopia

#3030ff · ΔE00 3.0

tritanopia

#2828ff · ΔE00 4.0

Run a whole palette through all three

The twelve nearest named colours

Ranked by CIEDE2000 — perceptual distance, not hex arithmetic. The closest isVibrant Blue at ΔE00 0.845: below 1.0 — an ordinary observer cannot tell these apart, even side by side. What the numbers mean.

8 of these have no page of their own: pages exist for the 4,961 colours the dataset marks as good names.