Threatening Red

#c30305

A red that is saturated. It is mid — the hardest range to put text on, either colour struggles.

Hex

#c30305

RGB

195, 3, 5

OKLCh

51.4% 0.210 28.9°

CIELAB (D50)

41.6, 65.8, 55.3

What is true of this colour, and of no other

  • 17 other named colours sit within ΔE00 2 of it — this part of the space is crowded, and the names here are finer distinctions than most people make.
  • It sits exactly on the sRGB boundary: at this lightness and hue the gamut has nothing left, and a wider display would show a more colourful version of it.
  • As text on white it measures APCA Lc 78.6; on black, Lc -23.2. The sign is the polarity, which the WCAG ratio discards.
  • Built into an eleven-step scale, 10 of the 10 adjacent pairs stay ΔE00 2 apart — see the ramp.
  • protanopia and deuteranopia and tritanopia shift it by ΔE00 39.3 and 42.2 and 46.8 — no red cone.

Text on this colour

White text

6.30:1 — passes AA

Black text

3.34:1 — large text only

White text is the better of the two at6.30:1. That is enough for body text.

The same colour, with one cone missing

As you see it

#c30305

protanopia

#47470c · ΔE00 39.3

deuteranopia

#6f6f00 · ΔE00 42.2

tritanopia

#8e8e00 · ΔE00 46.8

Run a whole palette through all three

The twelve nearest named colours

Ranked by CIEDE2000 — perceptual distance, not hex arithmetic. The closest isBlood Kiss at ΔE00 0.581: below 1.0 — an ordinary observer cannot tell these apart, even side by side. What the numbers mean.

8 of these have no page of their own: pages exist for the 4,961 colours the dataset marks as good names.